Janet Maslin is a good critic, but any doubts that she's been ghettoized by the Times as the "pop lit gal" should be removed. In fact, considered with this unfortunate headline, part of me suspects an anti-Maslin conspiracy.
Students now spend an average of $828 per year on academic books. A new study reports that the average textbook costs over $100, and that the cost has risen from $650 in 1996-1997. In related news, sales of Top Ramen have risen along the same exponential curve.
And you thought the David Denby coverage was bad? When I think about who to ask about sex, Steven Bochco is probably the last guy in line.
The lower your testosterone, the greater your chance of developing Alzheimer's. Scientific proof that Ronald Reagan and Charlton Heston were never men's men.
Donald Trump has a new book out in April, How to Be Rich. Random House will be paying Trump close "a lot more than a million dollars" with sizable royalties. Guess the folks at Random House didn't learn from the book, did they?
The Sunday Times claims that Pete Dexter is the most injury-prone writer in the world and then, because the writer of the article doesn't believe his own thesis, he offers a long expose of Dexter's physical condition. What next? A 2,000 word essay on Saul Bellow's hair?
Pay no attention to the title. Vintage Didion is not a Slouching/White repackage, but represents Didion's work in the Reagan era.
Norman Mailer turns 81 on Saturday and the Scotsman tries to examine why he isn't considered "America's greatest living writer." Without, of course, asking anyone here why.
Is the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette appropriating Crooked Timber's Books I Did Not Read This Year idea?
Sarah compares the TMFTML imbroglio with Moonlighting.
And cool enough that Yardley champions A.J. Liebling, a guy I've been meaning to read, but Teachout's there too.
Posted by DrMabuse at January 30, 2004 05:14 AMHey, I almost called him "the 12 tone or serialist blogger in an age of tonality" but thought better of it. Because frankly, it didn't make any sense then or now.
Posted by: Sarah at January 30, 2004 06:40 AM