The news that Paris Hilton is going to play Daisy Buchanan in an upcoming film version of The Great Gatsby might seem horrifying to some -- until we remember the fact that Daisy Buchanan was rich, ditsy and superficial. And so is Paris Hilton.
Even if Paris Hilton simply shows up to the set, this is nothing less than perfect casting.
Here are a few reasons why Paris Hilton will succeed in the role of Daisy Buchanan:
The other girl, Daisy, made an attempt to rise--she leaned slightly forward with a conscientious expression--then she laughed, an absurd, charming little laugh, and I laughed too and came forward into the room.
"I'm p-paralyzed with happiness." She laughed again, as if she said something very witty, and held my hand for a moment, looking up into my face, promising that there was no one in the world she so much wanted to see. That was a way she had.
"Gatsby?" demanded Daisy. "What Gatsby?"
"Why CANDLES?" objected Daisy, frowning. She snapped them out with her fingers. "In two weeks it'll be the longest day in the year."
She looked at us all radiantly. "Do you always watch for the longest day of the year and then miss it? I always watch for the longest day in the year and then miss it."
Perhaps Daisy never went in for amour at all--and yet there's something in that voice of hers. . . .
Then from the living-room I heard a sort of choking murmur and part of a laugh, followed by Daisy's voice on a clear artificial note: "I certainly am awfully glad to see you again."
He hadn't once ceased looking at Daisy, and I think he revalued everything in his house according to the measure of response it drew from her well-loved eyes.Posted by DrMabuse at April 11, 2005 12:10 PM
Fair enough. FSF might have even left us a clue as to how an emaciated Daisy would have looked in fetching green "night vision":
"Gatsby believed in the green light, the orgastic future that year by year recedes before us."
Prescient, no? Almost spooky, really.
Posted by: Rake at April 11, 2005 03:56 PMEd -- if you ever need a title for a new blog, try "Perfect Casting or Pathetic Fallacy?"
Posted by: bky at April 11, 2005 05:38 PMRake: I ALMOST pointed that out, but I thought that was too easy. :)
Posted by: Ed at April 12, 2005 10:23 AMI'm not a proud man. If it's teed up, I'm taking a cut at it. (Apparently Old Hag and I have the same standards.)
Posted by: Rake at April 12, 2005 02:19 PM