18 Fantasy Authors to Read Instead of J.K. Rowling

  • L. Frank Baum
  • J.G. Ballard
  • Marion Zimmer Bradley
  • William S. Burroughs
  • L. Sprague de Camp
  • Angela Carter
  • Philip Jose Farmer
  • M. John Harrison
  • Ursula K. Le Guin
  • Fritz Lieber
  • Richard Matheson
  • China Mieville
  • Michael Moorcock
  • Mervyn Peake
  • Jack Vance
  • Connie Willis
  • Gene Wolfe
  • Roger Zelazny

[UPDATE: And here are 18 more from Ms. Bond, who is more knowledgeable of this genre than I am. I too would add Kelly Link to the list, along with Neil Gaiman, Terry Pratchett, George R.R. Martin, and Philip Pullman — to name but only a few.]

[UPDATE 2: A call from Matt Cheney for Harry Potter alternatives.]

Protests and the SFPD: More Madness

So what exactly happened at the July 8, 2005 San Francisco G8 protests?

This Chronicle article reports that a bandana-masked attacker assaulted SFPD Officer Peter Shields. Shields and his partner, Michael Wolf, answered a call about anarchists, who were protesting G8, breaking windows. Someone tossed a mattress underneath their car and lit in on fire. Wolf tried to arrest someone who he thought lit the mattress. There was a chase and Shields was hit by someone from behind, suffering a fractured skull. Shields had no riot gear and backup was not called in time. These gruesome photos show Shields and suggest that the cops began swinging their batons at random protestors in retaliation. Because of all this, a no-confidence petition against Police Chief Heather Fong and Deputy Chief Greg Suhr. The latter was in charge of handling the protest.

The Mayor’s Office has issued a $10,000 reward for any information leading to the arrest of the assailant.

But that’s just one side of the story. This video suggests that the SFPD was reacting with the same uncool heads as the protestors. For one thing, the Chronicle article notes that police were randomly arresting people, associating them with the assault. If that was the mentality in place, then if the protestor depicted in this video was being as seriously choked as he looks to be, the onus also falls upon the SFPD for failing to coordinate and to react to the situation calmly. (Near the end of a video, we see the SFPD drawing guns on bystanders concerned about the choked protestor, ordering all to “Get back!” and to “Leave or you’re going to be fucking blasted!” — apparently, these are considered dependable ways to calm down a crowd.)

The protest was an uncontrolled one, as the Anarchist Action people themselves point out. Meanwhile, Suhr has been reassigned and the two protestors arrested have pleaded not guilty and there’s conflicting reports about whether or not there was a communications mishap.

Here are the questions that need to be asked:

  • Was there or was there not a communication breakdown? What measures are in place to protect officers from unexpected assaults?
  • Why did the officer depicted in the video place a chokehold on his assailant?
  • What evidence do the SFPD have to implicate the three arrested suspects?
  • Why did the SFPD draw guns and sling batons upon unwitting protestors? If the charges here were misdemanors, what motivates such a stunning response within police procedure? Further, is there hard evidence to back up some of the protestors’ claims?
  • Has any disciplinary action been taken against the officers who attacked the protestors or Suhr?
  • What was Suhr’s specific approach to handling protests? Does he have a history of using violence and intimidation to resolve conflicts (and encouraging officers to do the same)?

Interestingly enough, KRON’s Brian Shields (unrelated to Peter), a man who’s been trying to court Bay Area bloggers and who operates a blog, The Bay Area is Talking, wrote in the SF Indy Media thread (you have to click on one of the comments to access the dialogue), promising “to recognize that there is another source for information about events around the world, the source of citizens who have cameras and who report based on their own experiences.” At the time of this posting, the top post at The Bay Area is Talking is “What a night for baseball!” It’s good to see Brian Shields following up on the hard news stories. (Some of Brian Shields’ other Pultizer-worthy posts include “I Love the Fog,” “A More Practical Way to Connect with Women,” and “Gee I thought had a Crazy Weekend” [sic]. But at least he has one post up about the incident.)

Of course, if it were me, instead of just mining for links, I’d be using KRON’s resources to talk with the police officers, obtain police reports and the like, hunting down as many sides of the story as I could.

Or Maybe Today’s Producers Are Terrified of Rocking the Boat

Salon: “But the new leading men on television have lost that battle, or never even bothered to fight it. They’re all solitary supermen. Lonesome savants who seem to know everything there is to know — except how, or even why, to talk to women. Why have these still young, handsome guys given up, when the less young, less handsome and more drunk Sipowicz didn’t? Is it a question of timing? Did Sipowicz just reflect the Clinton-era fascination with moral fallibility and self-improvement? Maybe the new TV hero is perfect for Bush America: He’s always right, and certain of his rightness, and sees his isolation as proof of that rightness. But then again, George Bush is hardly the staunch defender of rationality and science that the bug collectors are. And these guys have great fun at the expense of “believers” of all stripes. In fact, that’s their problem: their middle-aged skepticism knows no bounds, and extends to the defiantly irrational realm of human relationships.”

Kids, Kids, Pugilism Isn’t the Answer

During the hours of 4PM-5PM Pacific Standard Time, we’ll be stuck in a windowless room with a speakerless computer and a rat scurrying about on the asbestos-ridden tile that we’ve nicknamed “Pinky” for company. (I named him “Pinky” because when I first said hello, he decided to bite my pinky and I spent several hours in the hospital getting a tetanus shot.)

But if you’re more fortunate than us and you’re free during that time, you can do no wrong by checking out this afternoon’s broadcast of Radio Open Source, which can be heard online. Mark Sarvas plans to oil up his chest and take LA Times Book Review editor Steve Wasserman into a five-match round that will involve lots of blood being strewn onto blank pages and perhaps more than a few angry tears. Kevin Smokler will also be there, presumably as the voice of reason.

As for us, like the Hag, we’ve been typecast as Lydon’s pariahs.